2016 in Geopolitical Review
2016 was a good year for authoritarians and delivered blow after blow to liberal democracy.
2016 was a good year for authoritarians and delivered blow after blow to liberal democracy.
Geopolitics shape events, not the other way around. The assassination does not upset Russo-Turkish relations.
Donald Trump’s pact doesn’t make sense. Neither Assad nor Russia is interested in defeating the Islamists.
It’s hard to take the Republican’s denials about Russian interference in the election seriously when he benefited from it.
China and Russia both challenge the West, but that doesn’t mean their interests are always aligned.
Russian warships sail past Ceuta this time, but its ambiguous NATO status makes it a popular port of call.
Southern European nations oppose fresh sanctions even though they have been least affected by them.
Rather than assume more responsibility themselves, some middle powers are switching patrons.
Russia is a great power again in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. Where does it go from here?
The Filipino president’s rhetoric reeks of opportunism rather than strategy, but there is risk in the long term.
Russia and the United States have short-, medium- and long-term interests in pacifying Syria.
The two Slavic peoples are willing to suffer far more than Westerners for their perceived national interests.
The fact that Iran allowed Russia to conduct airstrikes from its territory suggests the two are growing closer.
Vladimir Putin’s inner circle is slowly being filled with younger and politically less powerful officials.
The separatist republics are in ruins and its people’s minds have been poisoned by Russian propaganda.