Evaluating Macron’s Proposals for EU Reform
The Frenchman’s proposals fall into three categories: difficult, doable and low-hanging fruit.
The Frenchman’s proposals fall into three categories: difficult, doable and low-hanging fruit.
Senate elections in France and federal elections in Germany have made Macron’s job more difficult.
Calling the French president a failure for doing what he was elected to do makes no sense.
The president expects his approval rating to recover once liberalizations bear fruit.
The Frenchman argues rules must change to make Europeans feel the EU works for them.
Allowing buses to compete with railways on long-distance routes has lowered prices.
The president barely talks about an issue that preoccupies two-thirds of French voters.
The French president’s economic vision is a mix of the Californian and Scandinavian models.
The president loses support from the people who would be hurt by his reforms.
Don’t mistake the president’s theater for putting style over substance. The goal is economic reform.
The changes aren’t overly ambitious and stand a good chance of being rubber-stamped by parliament.
The new French president sets a red line and criticizes Barack Obama for not enforcing his.
It’s not an auspicious start, but the new president is rid of a potential troublemaker.
The president must convince the less prosperous half of his country that liberal reform will benefit them too.
Polls point to the biggest parliamentary majority for an incoming president since Charles de Gaulle.