Russia’s Arctic Posture: Defensive or Offensive?
Russian behavior in the Arctic is often interpreted as offensive. The reality may be more nuanced.
Russian behavior in the Arctic is often interpreted as offensive. The reality may be more nuanced.
Global warming will force hundreds of millions of Africans to flee, forcing the West to make some tough choices.
The president urges funding for ships in an area where America has fallen behind Russia.
The crisis in Ukraine is felt far north as America takes over the chairmanship of the Arctic Council.
Canada seeks to expand its influence in a region that could hold a quarter of the world’s remaining hydrocarbons.
Arctic Council states are reluctant to grant the supranational body observer status.
Russia needs the financial resources and skills of Western energy companies.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton argues “the Arctic has an increasing geopolitical importance.”
The Arctic represents the emergence of a new geopolitical arena for the Western alliance.
The two intend to deepen cooperation in the Arctic region. The reason? A country far away from the North Pole.
The polar region promises shorter trade routes and natural riches. The United States cannot afford to miss out.
The nations of the Arctic are cautiously starting to cooperate but remain competitors for the region’s vast hydrocarbon reserves.
“Right across the north of Europe there stretches an alliance of common interests,” said the British prime minister.
Thirteen European navies exercise in the Baltic Sea, preparing for operations in confined and shallow waters.
Two Russian bomber planes were tailed over the North Sea by Dutch F16 fighters on Tuesday.